Xiom Offensive S vs Loki Kirin K9
How Kirin K9 stacks up against one of Xiom’s most-played blades, using construction facts and Loki’s own spec sheet — not a verdict on which is better.
Xiom Offensive S is a classic 5-ply all-wood blade built for stroke development. Loki Kirin K9 introduces mild inner composite reinforcement, preserving all-wood ball feel on pushes and touch shots while providing a wider sweet spot and higher stability against modern plastic balls.
Head-to-Head Specification Comparison
Direct comparison of core material parameters, playing dynamics, and UK retail price points.
| Specification | Xiom Offensive S | Loki Kirin K9 |
|---|---|---|
| Category / Role | OFF Offensive Blade | OFF+ Offensive Blade |
| Blade Composition | 5-ply Pure Wood (Limba outer veneers) | 5 Wood + 2 Inner Aramid Carbon-Light |
| Thickness | 5.8mm | 5.7mm (±0.2mm) |
| Head Size & Weight | 157×150mm (~87g) | 157×150mm (~90g (estimate)) |
| UK Retail Price | ≈£38 (converted from $48 USD at ~0.79 exchange rate) | £33.99 inc. VAT |
| Tournament Compliance | ITTF Tournament Legal | ✔ ITTF 85% Natural Wood Rule Compliant |
Why This Pairing
Understanding the technical rationale and playstyle alignment behind this comparison.
Offensive S balances real control with genuine offensive speed. Kirin K9 chases the same speed-and-elasticity idea as Loki’s step-up carbon blade, with an ebony surface for sharper offence.
Note: We’re comparing where these two blades sit, not promising they’ll feel the same off the bat — every brand’s ply structure, fibre choice and tolerances differ. Use this as a sensible starting point if you’ve played the Xiom blade, not a guarantee.
Complete Your Setup with Recommended Loki Equipment
Pair this setup with complementary tournament rubbers and accessories.
Loki Kirin K9
5-wood + 2 Aramid Carbon Light blade with ebony surface; speed and elasticity, sharp offence
Loki Rxton 7
Tacky offensive rubber with balanced speed and high dwell for topspin development.
Loki Rxton 3 Max
Versatile all-round tacky sheet with medium cake sponge for control and placement.
Common questions
Is the Loki Kirin K9 as good as the Xiom Offensive S?
Loki UK doesn’t claim the Kirin K9 is objectively better than the Xiom Offensive S, and this page isn’t trying to declare a winner. Xiom Offensive S is a classic 5-ply all-wood blade built for stroke development. Loki Kirin K9 introduces mild inner composite reinforcement, preserving all-wood ball feel on pushes and touch shots while providing a wider sweet spot and higher stability against modern plastic balls.
What is the Loki Kirin K9 made of?
The Loki Kirin K9 is an OFF+ Offensive Blade, built as 5 Wood + 2 Inner Aramid Carbon-Light. That’s Loki’s own manufacturer specification for the Kirin K9 specifically, from Loki’s 2026 catalogue — see the table above for thickness and weight.
Is the Loki Kirin K9 legal for ITTF and Table Tennis England tournaments?
Yes. The Loki Kirin K9 is ITTF 85% Natural Wood Rule Compliant, so it’s legal for British League, county championships and sanctioned local league play, the same as the Xiom Offensive S.
How much does the Loki Kirin K9 cost compared to the Xiom Offensive S?
The Xiom Offensive S is priced at ≈£38 (converted from $48 USD at ~0.79 exchange rate). The Loki Kirin K9 costs £33.99 inc. VAT — check the live price above, since it updates automatically as stock and pricing change, unlike a figure typed into a page.
Build Your Custom Tournament Bat
Select your ideal blade, forehand rubber, and backhand rubber with professional assembly and edge tape included free.
Editorial & Compliance Disclosure: Category, construction, thickness, head size and tournament-legality facts for the competitor blade are drawn from its own manufacturer product listing. Loki figures are manufacturer specification from Loki’s 2026 catalogue. This page does not use or cite any third-party community rating site. UK competitor pricing is sourced from the relevant official UK distributor, dated on this page. Loki UK has no business relationship or endorsement from competitor manufacturers. All competitor trademarks belong to their respective owners.